Both are equally good, it depends on the player. CoD is more like telling you a story in a form that you get to be a part of it. On the other hand, Battlefield tells you an individual story of a person who's involved in the bigger story. Gameplay is equally good. Personally, i believe that BF has better physics but CoD is more simple unlike Battlefield which i sometimes find unnecessarily complex.
Again, the answer will depend on the personal preferences of the player. Wise ones enjoy both the franchises and don't waste their time comparing them 😉
At the risk of opening some unnecessary "COD is terrible, BF 4ever!" argument, I am very eager to see if Modern Warfare will actually be a good game. Because if it is, it might act as some motivator for DICE and EA to step up their act in the FPS genre as it feels like they've held some form of monopoly for the last few years.
I know that people can play both games, which I also intend on doing, but from a company perspective it's always about their own game - so hopefully if COD is a success, DICE will react and put more into the next BF
Hello! Can someone please give me a hand.. I just bought a brand new Lenovo Legion Y520 laptop with the following specs:
Intel Core i5-7300HQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz),8GB(1X8GBDDR4 2400),1TB/5400rpm,128GB M.2 SDD ,NVIDIA GTX1050 4GB,15.6" FHD (1920x1080) IPS,HD 720p
According to the system req test on this site, I should be able to play COD: World at War at high settings (or even max) with more than 60 fps. However that is not the case. I got tons of lag when on high settings, had to adjust to medium to be able to play. Even that wasn't 60 fps.
yup that why i love cod black ops 2.. cause is not that futuristic.. no jumping around with freaking jetpack.... and also they mixed the pass with the future thing.. so i guess it was win win..
I agree with you bagusprs 100%. I like Crysis for example which is an ultra sci-fi futurestic but I love it bcs it's "Crysis game" and I know what is it all about. But... I don't want these so called "Call of Duty" games bcs it is not even "C" of the real Call of Duty. 😲 There is a lot of places of warfare to explore in whole world and they can't find a single one so they choosing the "space" as the battlefield... 😞
because " Call of Duty " is not supposed to be like that ..
they should be more to the realistic type of war , instead of games like "mass effect"..
star wars is popular because they meant to be that way..
Well, the latest news says that Sledgehammer games (Developers of new COD 2017) just lost one member a good designer last month... Maybe Activision cancel their next installment for 2017. One more reason is YouTube and Internet's massive negative response to Call of Duty Infinite Warfare And Call of Duty franchise.
Again, the answer will depend on the personal preferences of the player. Wise ones enjoy both the franchises and don't waste their time comparing them 😉
I know that people can play both games, which I also intend on doing, but from a company perspective it's always about their own game - so hopefully if COD is a success, DICE will react and put more into the next BF
Follow these instruction after going to file origin:
Right Click on the .exe file
Go to properties
Go to compatibility
Run this program in compatibility mode for windows 7
This worked for me on NFS MW which was lagging as hell.Then I ran it as windows 7 compatibility which worked perfectly.
idk about this game optimization but its an old game..
Intel Core i5-7300HQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz),8GB(1X8GBDDR4 2400),1TB/5400rpm,128GB M.2 SDD ,NVIDIA GTX1050 4GB,15.6" FHD (1920x1080) IPS,HD 720p
According to the system req test on this site, I should be able to play COD: World at War at high settings (or even max) with more than 60 fps. However that is not the case. I got tons of lag when on high settings, had to adjust to medium to be able to play. Even that wasn't 60 fps.
Does anyone know why maybe?
Thanks a lot!
I think next game should be about like Afghanistan or did they??? i don't know actually. 😕
they should be more to the realistic type of war , instead of games like "mass effect"..
star wars is popular because they meant to be that way..
what about after stoneage warfare.What would be next?😊
1. Call of Duty Modern Warfare Series
2. Battlefield 3
3. Battlefield 4
4. Battlefield Hardline
5. Call of Duty Black Ops 1 & 2 and maybe Ghosts.
Btw I miss COD 1 + United Offensive) and 2 but they are too old to play nowadays to me. 😃
2012-2016 Battlefield